Flightcheck

The research confirms a direct policy-middleware competitor with many adapters and cryptographic receipts. Flightcheck's proposed difference is CRM-specific record semantics, blast radius, and customer baselines. Three of four referenced interfaces remain unverified and no structural incumbent cost is evidenced.

Statistical process control can help observe repeated measurable processes, but CRM writes are heterogeneous, policy changes make distributions nonstationary, rare errors can be catastrophic, and a low error rate does not authorize a consequential write. Control limits are monitoring signals, not correctness, lawful basis, consent, compensation eligibility, or business truth.

Every proposal needs a customer-owned policy version, source facts, identity and permission, record class, exact field diff, parent and dependency checks, duplicate and suppression checks, value limits, blast radius, reversible path, and destination state. Human sampling applies only to explicitly low-risk, reversible classes; high-impact, bulk, identity, opt-out, compensation, financial, employment, legal, or destructive actions require deterministic hard gates and authorized review.

Revops, CRM platform, security, and automation teams that allow agents to propose writes but need customer-owned controls and attributable recovery before production mutation.