Auditkeeper

Public-sector communications teams publish across several social channels while preserving approvals, accessibility, disclosures, corrections and records. An assistant can draft and schedule content, but it must not become an unobserved publishing authority. Auditkeeper receives a draft, binds it to source material and required labels, and routes the exact channel variants through human review before any publish command. The supplied research confirms a low-cost multi-channel publishing API with broad platform coverage and no public-sector approval or records positioning. That service and records-management tools are observed market references, not fixed product pricing. The research also cites AI-content transparency and public-records obligations, but applicability, retention and disclosure rules must be owned by agency counsel and records officers. Draft, source evidence, accessibility check, legal review, approval, scheduled command, platform acknowledgement, public readback, correction, takedown and records response remain separate. A signed log can show later mutation but not prove the source, approver or legal judgment was correct. The product can reduce unauthorized publishing and simplify records export. It cannot certify compliance, replace public-information officers, guarantee platform delivery or let an agent approve its own work.

A public-sector communications leader with named publishing approvers, records officers and counsel-owned channel policies.