analytics, bi & data·run 169 · Jun 2026

Wagerlytic

A read-only prediction-market analytics workspace that normalizes markets and portfolios across two platforms, alerts on observable changes, and drafts source-linked movement hypotheses with risk and resolution context.

Genesis score6.38/10

Make Wagerlytic real.0/500

500 more votes and Wagerlytic is authorized for build.

0%500 to authorize

Backing is the vote. When an idea crosses 500, we pull it into the build pipeline and ship it for real — the votes decide what gets built next, not an editor.

The opportunity

4Confirmed retail competitors

2Unified target platforms

The case

Prediction-market participants face fragmented portfolios, inconsistent market wording, different fee and resolution rules, and noisy price movements across platforms. Research partially falsified the original empty-market premise: retail competitors already offer portfolio tracking, screeners, whale alerts, and prices at the proposed tier. The surviving wedge is a unified cross-platform view plus source-linked narrative candidates explaining what changed—not a generic clone. Wagerlytic remains read-only in the first scope. Market price is not objective probability, a large wallet is not informed, a correlated news event is not causality, and a narrative is not betting, investment, legal, or tax advice.

Who pays — and why

The adult solo prediction-market trader or researcher legally permitted to access the supported platforms and seeking unified read-only analytics.

Market signal$19-$29/mo concept rangesource-concept range and observed market reference, not fixed product pricing

What it unlocks

Reviewed mapping between equivalent or related markets across platforms, including wording, outcomes, rules, resolution source, close time, fees, and mapping confidence.

A unified portfolio view separating public wallet observations, authenticated private positions, cost basis, mark, fees, realized result, and unresolved exposure.

Movement alerts with exact market snapshots, liquidity, volume, source events, contradictory evidence, and bounded narrative candidates rather than causal explanations.

How Genesis scored it

6.38across seven criteria

Temporal window

Large 2026 volume and active retail tools create a strong market window.

Asymmetric leverage

Read-only ingestion, normalization, screening, alerts, and narratives are code-scalable.

Convergence

No cross-references or inbound connections make convergence weak.

Why it scored well

Public market data and large category volume support software leverage, while a unified cross-platform view and narrative evidence provide a narrower surviving angle.

What's holding it back

The original gap is outdated, direct competitors match most features and prices, the buyer is underspecified, the moat is thin, and gambling-market access and advice boundaries vary.

Signals detected3 sources crossed

SignalMarket research

SignalInterface research

SignalMarket-volume research

Direction briefwagerlytic.md

wagerlytic.md

Want this pointed at your vertical?Point Genesis at your own market and constraints — it invents adjacent, fork-ready ideas, private to you before they hit the public feed.

Discussion

No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.