Skillproof
A compliance-training authoring workspace that ingests authorized, versioned primary rules and internal policies, generates claim candidates with exact clause citations, exposes conflicts and missing support, and publishes only after legal, policy and learning review.
Legal and learning teams need to know which source supports each assertion in compliance training. The supplied research confirms general course-authoring incumbents, a new source-citation product and mature document parsing and retrieval libraries but finds no compliance-training product with per-claim citations. One of three original capabilities was verified and two remain unverified. Skillproof does not treat citation as correctness. A cited clause can be outdated, outside jurisdiction, inapplicable to the audience, superseded, translated poorly or contradicted by internal policy. Every source record carries authority, jurisdiction, version, effective dates, applicability, rights, owner and supersession. Each training claim links to exact source spans and shows whether it is quoted, paraphrased, synthesized or an internal instruction. Unsupported claims fail review. A qualified legal or compliance owner decides external-rule applicability; a policy owner decides internal instruction; a learning reviewer checks clarity, accessibility and assessment design. Regulation, guidance, contract and internal policy remain different authority types. Generated draft, claim review, module approval, publication, learner assignment, completion, workplace behavior and compliance outcome remain separate. Signed citations prove version and provenance, not legal sufficiency, audit defensibility or learner understanding. The product cannot provide legal advice, certify compliance or auto-update a live course without review.
A legal, compliance or learning leader responsible for authoring and maintaining regulated training with reviewable source lineage.
Legal, compliance and learning leaders form an actionable buyer with established module spend.
Teams want generated speed while every compliance assertion requires source, scope, applicability and human authority.
The gap is clearer than the historical barrier, while mature retrieval and parsing now lower implementation cost.
A clear regulated-learning buyer, mature document tooling and an unoccupied per-claim citation workflow support a valuable pilot.
Two capabilities remain unverified, source and legal review are costly, citations do not solve applicability, and incumbents can add traceability.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.