Mapproof
An independent test harness that samples GRC AI control mappings, replays source retrieval under a declared method, records reviewer disagreement, and exports a signed verification packet with explicit scope and limitations.
GRC platforms increasingly use AI to map evidence to controls and frameworks. The supplied research confirms such capabilities at a major vendor and found no product aimed at independently verifying those outputs for an enterprise internal-audit buyer. The invention's specific 93.4 percent accuracy claim was not independently located and is excluded from public claims. Mapproof imports an authorized vendor mapping and its available evidence references, freezes the vendor, framework, control, evidence, and retrieval versions, selects a disclosed population and sample, replays retrieval where access and terms permit, and asks qualified reviewers to classify agreement, disagreement, missing evidence, ambiguity, or method limitation. It does not assume the original or replayed mapping is correct. Mapping relevance is not control design, operating effectiveness, compliance, certification, or audit opinion. A signed packet proves the retained sample, method, findings, and signer provenance only. One of two referenced interfaces remains unverified; vendor export, retrieval trace, and source access must be proven before automated comparison.
The internal audit, GRC, security assurance, AI governance, or compliance-technology leader at a large enterprise using AI-assisted control mapping.
Independent verification is valuable only if it preserves uncertainty and does not make the second model an unquestioned oracle.
Snapshotting, sampling, retrieval replay, comparison, review routing, and packet assembly scale through software.
AI mapping creates a new verification job, but independent sampling and replay are familiar assurance methods.
Confirmed AI control mapping, a clear independent-verification gap, enterprise audit demand, and software-scalable replay support a distinctive inverse product.
The accuracy anchor is low confidence, one interface is unverified, source access and vendor terms may block replay, qualified review is required, independence is contextual, and incumbents can add verification features.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.
