IntegrityLoop

Faculty often abandon academic-integrity reporting because evidence, email, conduct review, hearings and grade updates span several systems. IntegrityLoop launches from the learning environment, preserves authorized evidence and routes a case through the institution's own process. The supplied research confirms a large standalone conduct-case competitor, a similarity product with learning integration and an active document-processing extension. Institutional pricing and abandonment-cost estimates are observed market references, not fixed product pricing. No verified product owns the complete in-learning evidence-to-approved-outcome chain, but both originally referenced interfaces were unverified and institutional configuration is heavy. A similarity flag, authorship signal or screen artifact is not proof of misconduct. Source evidence, instructor concern, case acceptance, student notice, response, investigation, hearing, finding, sanction, appeal, grade command, acknowledgement and gradebook readback remain separate. The product can reduce administrative friction and preserve process evidence. It cannot determine guilt, guarantee chain of custody or alter grades without authorized final disposition and appeal controls.

An academic integrity, student conduct or learning-technology owner at an institution with faculty reporting abandonment and defined due-process rules.