Inkjudge

Organizations providing general-purpose AI models in Europe may need to assemble model descriptions, training-data summaries, compute information, evaluations and other records under Article 53. The supplied research confirms an August 2, 2026 enforcement milestone for relevant new models, a published voluntary Code of Practice and an official model-documentation form. Applicability and transition rules still depend on provider role, model date, systemic-risk status and current legal review.

Inkjudge inventories required claims, requests supporting evidence from accountable owners, maps each item to the current template and preserves reviewer decisions. It can emit human-readable and machine-readable records, but a signature proves origin and integrity only. It does not prove the content is complete, accurate, legally sufficient or accepted by an authority.

A proposed public well-known endpoint could make customer-approved disclosures easier to retrieve, but the supplied research does not establish it as an official or adopted standard. It must remain optional, clearly labeled and free of confidential material. A low-adoption public JSON schema confirms experimentation, not market consensus.

Evidence request, source submission, reviewer finding, legal applicability, approved disclosure, signature, publication, authority request, correction and outcome remain separate. The first release should support one model and one reviewed documentation form without automatic compliance scoring or regulatory filing.

Compliance, legal, model-governance or product leader at an organization reviewing whether it is a general-purpose AI model provider in Europe