GuildBench
A managed education-agent assessment registry that binds tests, human review, compliance evidence, scope, version, expiry, appeals, and observed outcomes to each listed release.
Large agent and skill directories already exist, and one marketplace runs an eight-point security scan, but the research found no education-specific assessment authority with tiered technical and human review. GuildBench evaluates an exact agent release for a named education use, environment, data class, user population, test battery, policy set, reviewer scope, and period. An Apprentice, Journeyman, or Master label is a navigation shorthand over visible evidence; it never certifies universal safety, security, legality, pedagogical quality, accessibility, privacy, accuracy, or fitness for employment. Buyers remain responsible for local validation, procurement, deployment, monitoring, and revocation. Builders receive reproducible findings, correction and appeal paths, while reviewer conflicts and commercial relationships remain disclosed. Directory rank cannot be purchased, and a listing is not an endorsement. Student or teacher data is excluded from public evidence, and assessment results cannot become student, educator, or worker scoring.
The education technology buyer, district or institution procurement team, agent builder, marketplace operator, or assurance partner needing version-specific assessment evidence.
Large current directories and 2026 education-AI governance pressure create a present trust gap.
Submission, automated tests, evidence, directory search, versioning, renewals, and appeals scale through software around expert review.
Two cross-references and six inbound connections support the assessment theme.
Large live directories, an existing marketplace scan, two usable verification primitives, and an empty education-specific assessment category support the concept.
Delivery is ULTRA, buyer and budget are broad, trust requires sustained expert operations, badge legitimacy is unproven, and directories or incumbents can add vertical review.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.
