GreenwallGate

Engineering teams using coding agents need to decide which changes receive deeper human review and preserve why a merge was allowed. The supplied research shows the market is already crowded: three live products provide sealed merge evidence, framework mappings or tamper-evident queues. The plausible remaining gap is explicit agent-session provenance and regulated-finance workflow detail, but the supplied evidence does not establish the personal-liability framing or a unique structural moat.

GreenwallGate would preserve organization, repository, branch, change identifier, base and head revision, author identity assertion, agent-use assertion, changed paths, dependency change, permission change, test evidence, static check, policy version, deterministic policy result, review candidate, rationale, reviewer, approval, rejection, condition, waiver, waiver expiry, merge request, code-host acknowledgment, merged revision, deployment link, incident link, rollback, correction and control-mapping assertion as distinct records.

Agent authorship is not a risk fact; human-authored code can be dangerous and generated code can be routine. Scores should prioritize review candidates, never decide merges. Framework mappings are documentation hypotheses owned by qualified security, audit and legal reviewers. A sealed ledger proves bounded record integrity, not control design, operating effectiveness, assurance readiness or compliance. The repository's existing protection rules and named owners retain merge authority.

The pilot should replay synthetic or historical changes in one test repository with no automatic merge or block. It should compare deterministic checks with reviewer outcomes and exercise waivers and rollback. The buyer may be an engineering platform, application-security or governance owner at a regulated software team, but team size, repository mix, framework obligations, budget and willingness to switch from three confirmed competitors remain unverified. Numeric competitor prices are omitted as observed market references rather than product pricing.

An engineering platform, application-security or governance owner responsible for review policy and change-decision evidence in a regulated software team.