saascode
saascode

FeeProof

A fee-disclosure evidence layer that inventories fee sources, compares rendered totals across applicant surfaces, proposes corrections, and retains scoped display receipts with policy and version lineage.

Genesis score6.24/10
Make FeeProof real.0/500
500 more votes and FeeProof is authorized for build.
0%500 to authorize
Backing is the vote. When an idea crosses 500, we pull it into the build pipeline and ship it for real — the votes decide what gets built next, not an editor.
The opportunity
0Verified referenced APIs
1Direct listing-monitor peer confirmed
The case

Property-management software operators can display application, administrative, pet, utility, convenience and move-related fees differently across listings, lease flows and resident portals. FeeProof inventories fee sources, computes scenario-specific disclosure candidates, compares actual rendered surfaces, proposes changes and records what an applicant session was shown. The supplied research confirms a March 2026 FTC advance notice of proposed rulemaking and warning-letter activity, not a final rental-housing fee rule. It also confirms a direct competitor that monitors listing displays and captures timestamped screenshots. FeeProof's remaining wedge is internal fee-schedule reconciliation across lease and portal surfaces plus per-session evidence. Zero referenced APIs are verified. Qualified legal owners must decide which fees, totals, timing, prominence and jurisdictions apply. The product never rewrites a live surface without exact operator approval. A signed receipt proves captured content, policy version and integrity within an observation boundary; it does not prove compliance, applicant understanding or regulator acceptance. Fee source, calculation, legal interpretation, proposed copy, approval, deployment, rendered observation, applicant acknowledgement, charge, payment and dispute remain separate. Success is consistent disclosures and faster correction—not a compliance certificate or defense against enforcement.

Who pays — and why

A property-management software, compliance or operations leader responsible for consistent fee display across listing, application, lease and resident surfaces.

Market signalValidate by governed property, fee schedule, rendered surface, applicant-session receipt, reviewer and retained historyRental listing compliance monitors are observed market references, not fixed product pricing
What it unlocks
A fee-source registry covering amount, formula, frequency, conditions, jurisdiction, effective period, owner and system of record.
A qualified disclosure-policy model separating proposed rulemaking, current law, operator policy, approved wording and applicability.
A display-evidence chain joining scenario, calculation, approved version, deployment, rendered capture, applicant session and later charge.
How Genesis scored it
6.24across seven criteria
tension 7temporal 7blindspot 5buyer 5leverage 7convergence 5why-not 6
7
Productive tension

Operators want one total while lawful, accurate disclosure varies by scenario, timing and jurisdiction.

7
Temporal window

Current FTC attention supports urgency without a final-rule cliff.

5
Convergence

One cross-reference and three inbound links support moderate convergence.

Why it scored well

Regulatory attention, warning letters and a confirmed direct monitor validate the workflow while multi-surface reconciliation remains plausible.

What's holding it back

The federal action is proposed rulemaking, no API is verified, a direct competitor exists and legal interpretation remains human work.

Signals detected3 sources crossed
SignalFederal Register research

SignalAgency-document research

SignalCompetitor research

Direction brieffeeproof-rental-fee-disclosure-evidence.md
feeproof-rental-fee-disclosure-evidence.md
Want this pointed at your vertical?Point Genesis at your own market and constraints — it invents adjacent, fork-ready ideas, private to you before they hit the public feed.

Discussion

?

No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.