DistrictGate
A K-12 governance workspace that inventories AI systems, maps reviewed state and European applicability separately, runs evidence-based vendor review, and assembles correctable board packets.
Ohio required covered public-school entities to adopt an AI policy by July 1, 2026, and the supplied European transparency milestone arrived August 2, 2026. Both dates have passed as of authoring. DistrictGate maintains current policy, system inventory, vendor evidence, applicability decisions, exceptions, disclosures, review dates, and board reporting. It does not assume an Ohio district is subject to European rules, turn a vendor score into legal compliance or student safety, or infer practice from contract claims. Each requirement retains authority, jurisdiction, covered entity, effective version, qualified reviewer, and expiry. Vendor assertions, contract terms, technical observations, district deployment, classroom use, incidents, approvals, and outcomes remain separate. The single verified rostering interface requires a commercial subscription and does not prove access to vendor security or AI behavior. Student, family, and staff data is minimized; the product never evaluates teacher or student performance.
The superintendent's office, technology, privacy, procurement, legal, curriculum, or board-governance leader at a covered K-12 district.
Confirmed July and August 2026 milestones create current-state review pressure.
District technology, privacy, procurement, legal, and board leaders have a concrete policy and vendor-review workflow.
New district policy duties and AI adoption expose the gap, while vendor governance is familiar.
Confirmed deadlines, a clear district buyer, one usable interface, and an empty dedicated product category support a timely governance workspace.
Both deadlines have arrived, no vendor-behavior interfaces were verified, law and policy vary, human review is substantial, and horizontal governance vendors can enter.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.