Courtproof
A guided property-condition capture workflow that links continuous video, timecodes, participant statements, condition candidates, corrections, signatures, custody, and jurisdiction-specific export questions.
Move-in and move-out disputes often depend on what condition was documented, when, by whom, under what notice, and whether the record remained intact. Research confirms a crowded field of photo-based inspection tools but no identified product combining continuous video, timecode-pinned condition narration, and a small-claims-oriented export. Courtproof guides landlord and tenant capture, preserves original media and custody, and drafts reviewable condition statements. It does not call a bundle court-ready, determine damage, allocate responsibility, interpret habitability or deposit law, establish admissibility, or predict a case. Hashes prove retained bytes, while device time, GPS, narration, completeness, and chain-of-custody claims still require scrutiny.
The solo landlord, small property manager, tenant, or inspection service seeking a stronger mutually reviewable condition record.
Solo landlords and small property managers have a specific recurring inspection and dispute workflow.
Guided capture, transcription, timecodes, hashing, comparison, and export are code-scalable.
Video and transcription are accessible, but evidence capture tools and condition reports already exist.
The landlord and tenant workflow is concrete, adjacent price validation is broad, and the continuous-video plus timecode delta is unoccupied in supplied research.
The market is crowded, no interface capability was verified, narration and custody can be disputed, legal rules vary, and timing is anecdotal plus regulatory tailwind rather than a hard window.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.