saascode
project & workflow operations·run 236 · Jun 2026

Sentigraph

A voluntary pulse-and-action benchmark cooperative that releases thresholded aggregate statistics with explicit definitions, contribution rules and privacy review.

Genesis score6.40/10
Make Sentigraph real.0/500
500 more votes and Sentigraph is authorized for build.
0%500 to authorize
Backing is the vote. When an idea crosses 500, we pull it into the build pipeline and ship it for real — the votes decide what gets built next, not an editor.
The case

Employee-survey platforms already hold cross-industry benchmarks, and the supplied research confirms a new small-business HR product with pulse surveys and AI action plans. No reviewed provider sells action-completion benchmarks as a standalone data product, but the proposed raw behavioral-data licensing model creates surveillance and re-identification risk.

Sentigraph collects voluntary pulse responses and organization-level action milestones under explicit employer and employee notices. It creates only thresholded, definition-controlled aggregate benchmarks; no employee-level or event-level dataset leaves the originating tenant. Independent privacy review governs cohorts, suppression and allowed use.

Survey invitation, voluntary response, local result, action proposal, approval, organization-level completion evidence, aggregation eligibility, benchmark release and employer outcome remain separate. Participation is not engagement, action completion is not workforce performance and benchmark position is not advice.

The first release should use synthetic data and a few organization-level metrics. It excludes individual scores, manager drill-down, role or tenure cells below privacy thresholds, raw-data licensing and employment decisions.

Who pays — and why

People analytics or employee-experience leader seeking comparable organization-level process benchmarks under strict employee privacy governance

What it unlocks
A metric dictionary linking survey item, action milestone, denominator, period, population, owner and comparability limits
A contribution ledger separating employee notice, voluntary participation, tenant authorization, aggregation eligibility, suppression and release
A benchmark product containing thresholded statistics and uncertainty rather than employee records or hidden behavioral telemetry
How Genesis scored it
6.40across seven criteria
tension 7temporal 7blindspot 5buyer 7leverage 8convergence 5why-not 5
8
Asymmetric leverage

Thresholded statistics scale once definitions and contributions are governed.

7
Productive tension

Benchmarks can guide investment, while cross-company comparison can enable surveillance, ranking and false causal claims.

5
Why nobody did it

The gap is clearer than the barrier; incumbents could package similar benchmarks.

Why it scored well

Benchmark demand is validated, action definitions create a distinct dataset and aggregate statistics can scale.

What's holding it back

An incumbent already owns deep benchmark data, privacy and comparability are difficult, one capability is unverified and the buyer and budget remain broad.

Signals detected4 sources crossed
SignalSupplied product research

SignalSupplied competitor research

SignalSupplied market scan

SignalSupplied technical review

Direction briefsentigraph.md
sentigraph.md
Want this pointed at your vertical?Point Genesis at your own market and constraints — it invents adjacent, fork-ready ideas, private to you before they hit the public feed.

Discussion

?

No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.