Permitlane

Construction and engineering applicants coordinate drawings, calculations, contractor evidence and departmental comments before a permit authority sees a package. The supplied research confirms a funded applicant-facing plan-review competitor with substantial processing volume, narrowing the gap to cross-party workflow and submission evidence. All three proposed interfaces remain unverified.

Permitlane starts from the jurisdiction's current official checklist and the project's approved scope. It assigns each requirement to an accountable professional, preserves revisions and flags missing or contradictory evidence. Qualified designers, engineers and counsel approve their work; an authorized applicant submits through the authority's real channel.

Checklist item, evidence candidate, professional finding, applicant approval, submission, authority receipt, completeness review, technical review, correction and permit decision remain separate. A signed bundle proves captured authorship and version history, not code compliance or approval.

The first release should support one permit type in one jurisdiction with manual import and export. It excludes autonomous filing, professional stamping, legal advice and outcome predictions.

Project controls, permitting or design leader at an engineering, procurement or construction firm coordinating a multi-party application