EssentialsProof
A Cyber Essentials 2026 evidence workbench for UK small businesses that inventories cloud services tied to business identities, collects authorized identity-provider and service observations, maps current MFA coverage and gaps to sourced scheme questions, and exports a reviewer-approved snapshot without claiming certification.
UK small businesses seeking Cyber Essentials can document policies while still missing the actual cloud services and identities whose MFA state matters. EssentialsProof builds a reviewable service-and-identity inventory from authorized workspace, directory, domain, expense, browser, and owner evidence, then observes where MFA is available, configured, enforced, bypassed, exempted, or unknown. A directory policy is not proof every service enforces it, successful collection is not complete scope, a signed snapshot proves only bounded integrity, and an evidence package is not assessor acceptance or certification. Scheme source, applicability, service inventory, account, identity, observed configuration, test, exception, reviewer conclusion, remediation, management assertion, assessor finding, certification decision, expiry, and correction remain distinct.
An owner, IT lead, security adviser, managed service provider, or compliance coordinator at a UK small business preparing for Cyber Essentials or maintaining its control evidence.
The updated scheme became live in April 2026, creating a current preparation need subject to later scheme revisions.
A versioned rule corpus, service inventory, collectors, tests, and snapshot exports can repeat across customers.
Three cross-references with no inbound or direct connections provide limited corroboration.
Three cross-references, confirmed April 2026 scheme changes, verified workspace interfaces, and no identified small-business continuous evidence service specific to the current Cyber Essentials question set support a dated, code-scalable wedge.
There are no inbound or direct connections, cloud-service discovery is incomplete, paid-add-on and service-specific MFA semantics vary, scheme interpretation requires current qualified review, the package cannot guarantee assessor acceptance, pricing is unvalidated, and no structural incumbent cost is evidenced.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.
