Disclosweep
A one-shot back-catalog review that finds likely material-connection disclosure gaps, proposes source-linked inline and machine-readable patches, and records exactly what a human approved.
Affiliate publishers can accumulate years of sponsored, gifted, commissioned, and revenue-linked posts whose disclosures are missing, unclear, or detached from the relevant endorsement. The supplied research makes an overbroad claim that AI assistance itself triggers a universal FTC disclosure duty and attaches a per-post fine; that is not sufficient authority for the product. The durable wedge is narrower: review owned content for material-connection disclosure gaps, route evidence and proposed patches to a qualified human, and preserve a limited attestation of the sweep.
The owner, editorial lead, or affiliate-operations manager of a publisher with a meaningful owned back catalog.
The input identifies current concern, though its specific AI-rule framing requires correction.
The product must move quickly across a catalog while refusing unsupported legal conclusions or auto-publication.
The input records several cross-references but no inbound graph connections.
A clear publisher buyer, a finite back-catalog instrument, and reviewable patch mechanics create a practical one-shot product.
The central enforcement claim lacks primary authority, the interface is unverified, the moat is thin, and disclosure analysis remains context-specific.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.