Discla30

The supplied research confirms that a proposed federal acquisition clause published in March 2026 described disclosure of AI systems used in contract performance within thirty days after award. It also says the comment period was extended and the clause was expected in a later refresh. That is a real workflow signal, not evidence that every award currently carries the clause.

Discla30 would begin with the executed contract and a current primary-source review. An authorized operator records clause presence, award and modification dates, contract line items, task orders, AI-system identities, versions, providers, uses and evidence. The product maps proposed disclosures to the contract scope, routes them through program, security and contracts review, and assembles a signed package for the authorized submission channel.

The central risk is false compliance. An inventory entry is an operator assertion until reviewed. A model-to-line-item match is a proposal, not contract interpretation. Package generation is not filing, delivery or acceptance. A deadline exists only after qualified review confirms the controlling clause, triggering event and computation. Append-only events and hashes can support bounded integrity, not immutability, truth or government acceptance.

The buyer hypothesis is a federal contractor's contracts, program or compliance function using AI in contract performance. The input does not establish the full role, company size, budget or current alternative. A narrow pilot should prove inventory completeness, mapping agreement and package usability before building broad federal coverage.

A federal contractor's contracts, program-compliance or legal-operations team responsible for identifying contract-specific AI use and coordinating reviewed disclosures when an executed award actually requires them.