ConsentBeacon
A two-sided fiscal-sponsorship workflow that matches projects to published sponsor criteria, routes agreement drafts for qualified review and preserves sponsor-controlled fund and receipt evidence.
Grassroots projects seeking fiscal sponsorship must discover sponsors, compare published criteria and fees, disclose their activities and obtain an independent sponsor decision before accepting tax-deductible donations. ConsentBeacon turns that process into a traceable match and agreement workflow, but a profile match is not eligibility, a generated agreement is not legal advice or signature, payment-provider acceptance is not sponsor acceptance or settlement, and the sponsor—not the project or platform—retains authority over charitable funds and donor receipts. Schedule R output is preparation evidence for qualified tax review, never a filing conclusion. The project-side matching gap is supported by the supplied scan, while two of four interfaces remain unverified.
An early-stage grassroots project seeking a fiscal sponsor and the nonprofit sponsor team evaluating, onboarding and overseeing accepted projects; exact role, budget and alternative remain broad.
The source identifies a current external reporting trigger, subject to primary-authority verification.
The product enables self-service discovery while preserving the sponsor's independent discretion and control.
The source records two cross-reference mentions and one inbound connection before the grounded score.
The source confirms sponsor-side products and directories but no project-to-sponsor matching workflow, while identifying a current tax-reporting trigger and a coherent two-sided mechanism.
Buyer authority and economics are broad, two interfaces are unverified, legal and tax review plus marketplace operations remain material, and the network moat is hypothetical before sponsor participation.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.