BlueprintCheck
A commercial and multifamily drawing-set preflight workspace that identifies sheets, grids, spaces, assemblies, schedules, equipment, climate and jurisdiction assumptions; maps them to licensed, effective-dated energy-code rules; pins review candidates with citations and confidence; and routes every finding to qualified professionals without claiming design compliance, a stamp, permit acceptance, or energy performance.
Architects, energy consultants, engineers, and permit expediters repeatedly inspect drawing sets for missing or contradictory energy-code information before formal review. BlueprintCheck extracts a bounded model from PDF, CAD, or BIM-derived files and produces coordinate-linked questions and finding candidates. File ingestion is not complete design understanding; a citation is not a correct interpretation; a detected mismatch is not a violation; a suggested fix is not a design decision; and professional sign-off is not authority approval. Standard text, adopted edition, local amendment, project facts, extracted geometry, calculation, model result, reviewer disposition, stamped document, submission, permit review, inspection, occupancy, measured performance, and correction remain separate.
An SMB architecture practice, energy-code consultant, engineering team, design-build firm, or permit expediter reviewing commercial or multifamily projects before professional and authority submission.
The supplied launch signal validates current buyer attention, subject to source-date and product-status revalidation.
Architecture, energy-consulting, engineering, design-build, and permit-expediting roles have a concrete preflight task and expensive review cycles.
Zero cross-references, two inbound connections, and zero direct connections provide limited graph corroboration.
A live horizontal scanner, a second horizontal competitor, an open model checker, a concrete architecture and energy-review buyer, jurisdiction-version complexity, and no supplied energy-specific paid scanner support a narrow preflight wedge.
The graph evidence is light, horizontal competitors already cover energy standards, no structural copying cost is shown, standards licensing and local amendments complicate coverage, drawing extraction can be unreliable, professionals retain authority, and fixed pricing is unvalidated.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to weigh in.